Uber Not Criminally Liable in Fatal 2018 Arizona Self-Driving Crash

Uber Technologies is not criminally liable in a March 2018 crash in Tempe, Arizona, Where among the Organization’s self-driving Automobiles struck and killed a pedestrian, prosecutors said on Tuesday.

The Yavapai County Attorney said in a letter made public that there was”no basis for criminal liability” for Uber, but the backup motorist, Rafaela Vasquez, should be referred to the Tempe authorities for further investigation.

Prosecutors’ decision to not pursue criminal charges removes one possible headache for the ride-hailing company since the organization’s executives attempt to resolve a long list of federal investigations, lawsuits and other legal risks before a hotly anticipated initial public offering this season.

The crash involved a Volvo XC90 sport utility vehicle that Uber was having to test self-driving technology. The fatal mishap was a drawback from which the firm has yet to regain; its autonomous vehicle testing remains radically reduced.

The accident was also a blow to the entire autonomous vehicle industry and led other companies to temporarily halt their testing. Scrutiny has mounted onto the technology, which presents deadly risks but has minimal oversight from regulators.

Vasquez, the Uber copy motorist, could face charges of vehicular manslaughter, according to a police report from June. Vasquez has not previously commented and couldn’t immediately be reached Tuesday.

Based on a video shot inside the car, documents gathered from online entertainment streaming agency Hulu and other evidence, authorities said last year that Vasquez was looking down along with loading an episode of the tv show”The Voice” on a phone until roughly the time of the crash. The driver looked up a half-second before hitting Elaine Herzberg, 49, who died from her injuries.

Police called the incident”totally preventable.”

Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, that analyzed the case at the request of Maricopa County in which the accident occurred, did not explain the reasoning for not finding criminal liability from Uber. Yavapai sent back the case to Maricopa, calling for additional expert analysis of the movie to ascertain what the driver should have observed that evening.

An Uber spokeswoman declined to comment on the correspondence.

The National Transportation Safety Board and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are still exploring.

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office didn’t immediately comment on Tuesday.

Uber at December filed confidentially for an initial public offering and is expected to seek a valuation of up to $120 billion. Its self-driving program, which costs hundreds of millions of bucks and doesn’t generate revenue yet, is very likely to come under scrutiny by investors.

The ride-hailing firm, which last year dropped about $3.3 billion, is betting on a transition into self-driving automobiles to eliminate the need to cover drivers.

In an autonomous vehicles conference in Silicon Valley a week, business leaders resisted the loss of confidence in the general public, regulators and investors that lingers annually after the Uber crash. There is not any consensus on safety standards for the business.

In March 2018, authorities in Arizona suspended Uber’s ability to check its self-driving cars. Uber also voluntarily halted its whole autonomous car testing program and abandoned Arizona.

In December, Uber resumed limited self-driving automobile testing in Pittsburgh, restricting the automobiles to a small loop that they can drive only in fine weather. The company is now testing with two people in front seat and much more rigorously monitors safety drivers. The company also said last year that it made improvements to the vehicles’ self-driving applications.

Uber has not resumed testing in San Francisco or Toronto, in which it formerly had programs.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here